Tip Jar

Support Blog

Tip Jar

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Follow on Twitter

    « Gizmodo, Why Are You Such TechoCommunnists?! Instagram Could Get Us All Paid | Main | Both Left and Right Will Have to Give on Response to Newtown Massacre »

    12/18/2012

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54fce13cf8834017c34bb0a34970b

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What Was Adam Lanza's Online Footprint?:

    Comments

    Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

    Korpov Korpov

    If I heard Tizzers was arrested in connection with a mall or school shooting I’d be shocked. He’s the last person I’d ever expect to do something like that. I understand you hate him for all the griefing in the past. I also get you’ve confused him with other griefers and you believe he’s some sort of schizophrenic stalker that’s spent half a decade griefing you 24/7; but if you actually knew Tizzers you’d realize even hinting he’d do something like that is pure insanity.

    Catherine Fitzpatrick

    If Korpov were placed at the scene of a school shooting, no one would be surprised, either.

    Kоrpоv Kоrpоv

    I’d be surprised and I’m pretty sure anyone that knows me would be as well. Just because I griefed Second Life when I was younger that doesn’t mean I want to kill people, especially students.

    Doctor Yootz

    you won´t get out of that rabbit hole catherine, won´t you?

    Catherine Fitzpatrick

    Er, I'm not in any rabbit hole. I'm fine, and identified in Second Life and real life as who I am, with an online reputation.

    You aren't.

    And meanwhile you kids, whether you're 20 or 40 or grown up or not, keep buying land near me or even on my sims, putting up grief builds, and griefing me with creepy effigies, so it would seem you're in the rabbit hole not me.

    Kоrpоv Korpоv

    Last I checked Doctor was the only one that had land near you and he abandoned it. Second, nobody in our group is rezzing those weird ass effigies. Everyone stopped logging in regularly after we got Sandvich banned.

    Doctor Yootz

    I actually meant your mind, that still seems to be trapped in a wonderland, where everyone else is some kind of communist, terrorist, hedonist, sociopath or psychopath.
    Every time i read one of your articles it seems to get worse, and i honestly feel sorry for you, and hope you do better in real life than on the internet.

    Catherine Fitzpatrick

    Actually, anyone who would spend as long as you and your creepy little friends on your various alts making grief builds and putting dead chickens on my land, etc. can hardly be telling anyone else they are "trapped in a wonderland" or "in a rabbit hole".

    I have a perfectly fine and rich first life and second life. Apparently you don't, as you spent years harassing me and still do, even now. One of your little sick friends whom you played with continues to harass me in particularly creepy ways, you know it, I know it, and you pretend I'm the problem lol.

    People who continue to build grief builds with Soviet themes and harass others for years on end on their server *are* communists, terrorists, sociopaths and psychopaths. Creepy RL effigies of people dying or being eaten or burned or chopped in increasingly creepy ways -- this *is* psychopathy.

    All I do is report it, and move on. I report it. And that's what bothers people -- that I record it and abuse-report it.

    Too bad.

    Kоrpоv Korpоv

    Our group could care less about you. Everyone’s moved on from Second Life and they’re playing other games, working on getting their degrees or starting their careers. The only reason Doctor and I are here now is because someone sent me a link to this post and you stated I wouldn’t be surprised if Tizzers pulled a mass shooting, which was incorrect.

    I’m pretty sure Joanna (which isn’t Tizzers btw Wut was trolling you) and Wut Moorlord have been the ones constantly harassing you over the past 2 years, although I can't say that with certainty because I haven't talked to either of them in ages.

    Do you really think griefers are bothered by being reported and recorded? If they were worried about that they wouldn’t be griefing in the first place. Griefers aren’t communists, terrorists, sociopaths or psychopaths they’re attention whores. You write about griefers on your blog with the notion that they’ll be banned faster. In reality they want you to blog about their griefer attacks. They also think the novel sized rants you write about them are hilarious and they’re worth losing an account over. Why do you think Joanna (or whoever’s) effigies are getting weirder and weirder? They get your attention, you respond by writing a blog post about them, they read it and laugh at how ridiculous your post is and then they attempt to get an even crazier response by making weirder effigies. All you’ve done over the past eight years is create a cycle of griefing that’ll continue as long as there’s a supply of bored 15 year olds in Second Life and you continue to give them attention.

    Catherine Fitzpatrick

    The goal of Anonymous, which is a modern form of totalitarianism, is first of all to distract from its true nature and pretend its just a fun-loving group committing meaningless pranks, and that people who object to their methods are old, out of touch, not cool, fussy, etc.

    Anyone who continues to document that their methods in fact are relentless and cruel and hugely damaging then is singled out for further persecution to try to discredit their accurate reports. This is a deliberate method.

    Anonymous and its offshoots in Second Life make a special sport of trying to convince the people they victimize that it's their own fault, that if only they wouldn't abuse-report their violations of the TOS, or publicize their wild and nasty antics, why, all would go well with them. This is just like the omerta that the mafia wants to throw over everyone, perpetrator and victim alike.

    It's an old thugs' technique and one constantly used by the secret police of Russia, Iran, China, etc. -- "stay silence, and maybe we'll go easy on you".

    These latter-day totalitarians seek absolute, total and blanket control over the Internet by themselves. This fact can be disguised by the appearance of "anarchy" or "loose-knit networks" or "funny memes," but in reality, they want to make sure that no one uses the Internet for purposes they disapprove of -- whether commerce or political expression or religion or even in maintaining a liberal democratic state. All of it is relentlessly undermined and those who report on it are incessantly harassed in the hopes that they will be bullied into silence.

    I see absolutely no reason why people and movements like this shouldn't be publicized. For one, not publicizing them doesn't do any good. Many people in fact try that method. At times, simply because I was busy or travelling, I'd try that method myself. It doesn't work. It's not meant to work. What's meant to happen is that the online bullies convince you to play their game of not fighting back and not revealing their true nature to the wider public.

    Nothing any bully says in a totalitarian movement can be believed as to who they are, who their alts are, who somebody else's alts are. And it doesn't matter. The formula they are trying to impose by brutal force is this: be silent, and it will go well with you, why, you gave us so much attention, and all we did was up the ante.

    This logic is being proposed by the psychologist constantly displayed by Anonymous -- as Total Biscuit, the anti-SOPA mass propagandist and agitator, who is claiming that the way to deal with school shootings is to muzzle the media and not let them report them as they see fit. They exaggerate how the media in fact covers these tragedies and makes false claims that they are "in it for the money" or "creating murder reality shows" blah blah. They claim that the coverage glorifies the shooters or exaggerates their carnage -- when in fact that's not even the case. And even if it *were* the case, Total Biscuit and other Bolsheviks can't explain what their plan is to remedy this -- um, a socialist committee that gets to have clearance over all TV shows? "Guidelines" prepared by an authoritarian state that tells producers how they should cover stories? Because that's what they are suggesting, if not voluntary "politically correct" muzzles that would be decided by a gang of anonymous thugs who want to cover the tracks of the result of violent gaming and nihilist online culture. Why should we help them with that?

    A sicko Internet stalker who gets his sense of self-worth and entertainment by making increasingly sick and gory effigies may have no shame, but by publicizing what he's doing -- naming and shaming -- the bar is set for what is not acceptable and what the community find abhorrent.

    The people doing this are psychopaths and cunning manipulators, and they aren't interested in finding a way for themselves to stop; they're interested in trying to silence you and bully you. I see no reason why they should be indulged in this manipulation.

    Catherine Fitzpatrick

    On my Second Thoughts blog, I have a rule: no one can post unless they provide an SL or RL valid name, and no one can post if they incite or cause damages in RL or SL.

    If someone shows up here who used to relentlessly grief me in SL by their own admission, and which the record amply shows (Korpov in particular on a variety of alts, some of which are still in SL), if he claims he is outside of SL and no longer griefing, and especially if he claims he wants to clear his name and deny that he thinks anyone would be a school shooter, I'd be inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt, as they are identifiable at least as SL avatars, and in their posts, they aren't inciting or causing damages.

    But with this last one, it's clear to me that the purpose is in fact to incite damages and to blame the victim. The purpose is to whistle to all the 15 year olds -- and BTW, more likely 45-year-olds -- and say "Hey, here's an easy target who won't do what we say and shut up about our griefing, go get them."

    And when people do that, I see no reason not to invoke my rule that you can't use comments to keep inciting damages to me or others.

    Good bye.

    The comments to this entry are closed.

    Google AdSense

    Google AdSense

    Blog powered by TypePad