An end-of-the-world snow parcel in SL has the delightfully alliterative name of "Our Narnia." I've flown out there some nights just to look at the awesome ice-crystal towers against the dark, starry, snowy night sky.
I also take the opportunity to ponder why in RL, as often in SL, the greatest architectural marvels of the world are often built by evil-doers or in celebration of evil or take the side of evil. Sure enough, this awesome build features the Witch's castle, the witch who freezes people to death into statues in her courtyard, not some other kinder aspect of "Our Narnia. And, inside, there are implements of torture...
It's an old story that evil is always more interesting and compelling -- everybody reads or remembers Dante's Inferno, but they don't bother with Paradiso. Everyone remembers tag lines from Eddie Haskell, but not Wally Cleaver. And so on.
In SL, too, it's a rule of thumb that some of the most arrogant, nasty, authoritarian assholes have also made some of the greatest builds. Again, it's an old story, often remarked about Wagner and his musical genius, contrasting with Hitler's inspiration from this music.
There is something about evil and order that often go together; good often must become anarchic and disorderly to undo that deathly order that is the order of the grave.
By the same token, evil's order is often brittle, unable to sustain itself, a fragile order that you push on, and it falls over. Evil is often petty in its order of little minutiae -- forgetting the larger order of the bigger, more important things.
In our miniature world of SL, it's "always winter and never Christmas" in some ways, too. Well, there's the literal version of this truism, that snow sims always stay snowy, and that for every person who puts out a Christmas tree or puts carol music on their parcel, there are scores of others who sneer and jeer at them for allegedly being intolerant of other religions or imposing one religion, --in the annual anti-religious seizure of political correctness that really should be made a winter holiday all its own, Correctivus.
But in the larger sense, the "always winter/never Christmas" problem of SL has to do with the eternal argument about code is law or code is not equal to law or code is not just law -- code must always make winter if it is set to make winter, but code cannot make Christmas.
In dealing with the many disperate nasty beasts of the forums -- people who you'd like to imagine aren't this nasty in RL -- I'm often reminded of the battle sceen in the "Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe." Reminded, not because they're ugly or behave viciously -- though, that too.
Reminded, because of the jeering and taunting of the noble creature, Aslan and of the children who are fighting for good, on the side of good. So often, the jeering, taunting and harassment of the forums appears so petty and banal, as evil often does.
Anyone glancing through weeks of comments on this blog, often by the same person under different pseudonyms, often saying the same thing, can see the same spirit of banality and jeering so colourfully exemplified in the panoply of ugly beasts in the Narnian scene.
As I can see many of these nasty jesters and jeerers reaching through their reply button, let me hasten to assure you that I do not imagine myself to be a Messiah, or Aslan, or the Greater Good. It's not about whether I'm good or bad. It is about chosing to fight on the side of good, however, and I think anyone who dispassionately looks at the forums can see where the divide lies -- those who consistently jeer at others, belittle them, call them names, disparage them, personally attack them, impugn the realness of their life, reveal their RL details, and a host of other typical crimes -- not the least of which is ganging up on someone like Cocoanut, who exposes these evil practices, and impudently sneering that she doesn't criticize Prok for his "vitriol" -- proof positive that they are able to dish it out, but cannot take it reflected back at them.
The techniques uses by these people are appalling -- ugly pictures, even things like a photoshopped raven's head blown up and bloodied, or telling them to "cut off their fingers" or "sew a corpse's cock on" or whatever lurid and vivid manifestation of ugliness they can think up.
This is because they don't like the original characterization of group-think in which they participate, and they will do anything to preserve their group-think.
Another chief characteristic of this group-think, besides the nasty invective -- of the kind people like Enabran have a constitutional blindness toward -- is bloody-minded literalness -- this is the taking of everything so literally, and extending it out so "logically," that it becomes absurd.
Thus a spoof on Aimee's 'government' -- as evidenced only by her silly diagram of a civic city area (well we can only hope it's silly and not real!) becomes fuel for more paranoid and hysterical ramblings about skybox security -- as if Aimee doesn't know perfectly well that Inever come near her skybox, and have no idea where it is, and in fact one of her friends that she admitted to her precious skybox took this snapshot and gave it to me -- because even her friends aren't just THAT impressed with Aimee ALL the time lol.
More than all this petty six-grade stuff, however, is the essense of the tekkie problem -- the belief that code is law -- although after all, is merely just lines of stuff they wrote in lock-step fashion to solve by rote routines this or that issue as they identified it -- and subjectively identified it often without any appreciation of the larger context. Whatever its capacity to drive machines in lock-step, mechanical fashion, code is merely one more imperfect and flawed human creation like a thousand others. It isn't the Perfection of Creation itself. Belief in this code-law is merely one more manifestion over the millenia of man's pride and failure to experience humility in the face of the real awesomeness of the Creator.
Law, of course, can be taken literally, and when taken literally, it can be death. We see manifestions of this in our own micro-world, when the Lindens can police a garden-variety TOS violation like a "note-card spamming," or a situation where a sign-griefer is blocked on all 4 sides as indeed a violation of the TOS, but overlook the larger picture of someone spamming thousands of parcels all over SL with IMPEACH BUSH signs, and simply find no way in their book of codes and laws to address this larger rent in the fabric of civility and civilization.
In Narnia, before the battle, the Witch sneers at Aslan that a law must be fulfilled. It's the old "deep magic" of the stone table that says that a traitor must be killed. Of course, the original intent of the law might have been that a traitor to the good project of the originally-created seasonal Narnia be killed, not the traitor to an evil project like the always-winter freezing Witch's Narnia. No matter. Law is law. Aslan does not dispute it at that level. He admits that the traitor must be punished by a death -- only substitutes himself as the sacrificial lamb on the traitor's behalf. This is the essence of the Christian faith, and Aslan describes it as the "Deeper Magic".
He doesn't bend the law, he does *not* say, oh, make an exception to the law, that's the children's brother, and can probably be persuaded to repent, or an exception should be made to the Witch's taunting demand for his head, merely because she is evil, and herself betraying a traitor who in fact served her whom she's willing to sell down the river when convenient.
Instead, Aslan says, ok, the law is correct, it must be implemented, but if a sacrifice is demanded, I will make it. Then by that Deeper Magic contained in the stone table, placed there by the Emperor-Beyond-the-Sea, Aslan's Father, Aslan rises again -- though not before, interestingly, he is unbound by the many ropes placed on him, which are gnawed away by mice -- symbolic of both the petty regulations that attempt to bind a greater fulfillment of the law and by the importance of tiny gnawings on getting rid of lawless and brutal petty literal-minded "law-enforcement".
BTW, with all the media hype of Narnia and the movie now, there's a great deal of jeering about the use of the Christian myth and allegories in this story originally written back in the 1950s by the British college don C.S. Lewis. I'm fairly certain from having read amply of Lewis' work and the numerous biographies about him that his intent was not to have the reader become dismayed that his story was in fact "smuggling in Christian allegory" to spring on an unsuspecting -- and then later annoyed -- reader.
Rather, when the reader is delighted by the story and intrigued by the figure of Aslan, Lewis' intent as a converted Christian himself was then to help the reader to an awareness that Jesus Himself is that kind of attractive figure of Aslan, or delight and intrigue, and not the tacky cliche of a thousand banal and boring religious devotional exercises that have rendered Him as a smarmy and sickly-sweet -- and often Wonder-Bread-White -- character.
The Witch tried to play what we all know and love as the forums "game of gotcha" -- saying, see, here's the law. We know the law! The law says this, so Edmund must die. Whereas Aslan, while fulfilling the law, goes beyond it and lends the entire world the meaning of redemption in the process.
You never get that kind of volume and depth of fulfillment of the law, much less any Higher Law of redemption from the law's punitive and killing aspects, by any notion of "code is law".
I find that people who have trouble understanding this are often the ones willing to celebrate the uniformity and law-conformity of evil and quickly dispel what they view as the messy and problematic manifestations of good, even when the good is manifestly the greater good and the evil is manifestly evil.
I pointed out to one FIC representative who urged me "never to contact him again" (another paragon of tolerance!) that his grumping about finn Jensen's one notecard "spam" and his willingness to do nothing and remain silent about Lazarus world-spamming all over SL with his IMPEACH BUSH signs was not only hypocritical, but part of why the battle isn't getting won. He replied that fighting IMPEACH BUSH isn't a battle that can be won, whereas haranguing poor finn over the card is a battle that can be won.
Yes, to be sure, in SL you have to pick your battles. Somehow I don't think beating up on poor finn and indulging in the easy and common forums sport of Anshe-bashing is really a noble battle.
But...the IMPEACH BUSH battle would be won much easier if all those who get eyebleeds over the events list and get huffy over a single notecard spam would put their indignation and their forums ranting to work against the IMPEACH signs, and would also abuse-report Lazarus Divine, hold meetings about the problem, write petitions, contact the RL media -- do a thousand things that can be done to fight any battle. Any one of these methods don't work by itself; together, with lots of people doing them, they do.
If Adam Zaius would stop smugly watching the mainland go to hell with the IMPEACH signs so he can have more customers on his Azure islands and would vocally and forcefully condemn the signs and speak frequently to Philip in his frequent contacts with him and other Lindens; if Aimee Weber would stop having fake angst about the supposed artistic dilemmas caused by the need to balance creativity and curbs on freedom of expression and use her power and prestige in SL to save the look of the mainland, she, too, has evidently left for the islands; if all the land barons and people selling land would stop cutting out squares for him on his request (we continue to see this everywhere) just to make a buck themselves; we would start seeing the Lindens get to work on this problem using their existing TOS against spam and disturbance of the peace.
Oh, is it petty to make a battle between "evil" and "good" about a *game*? Not at all. Like I said, it's not that people are good or evil; it's that they chose the sides of good or evil, and those sides manifest themselves even in a game, even on our miniature level of SL. The banal and petty spirit of a witch sneering that it's time to kill a traitor -- a traitor that in fact served her! a traitor that SHE is P.S. now betraying herself! a traitor she now betrays to the Law in order to harm the children fighting her! -- this sneering, evil spirit is no different than the spirit manifest on the forums -- and everyone knows it.
It's common for people to say that remain in the game "because of the people". In all my life, even in the most evil of settings, I've never seen such a concerted, energized, resilient, and feted group of nasty people as I have in SL, especially on the forums. I often marvel at it. It's the reason I feel I must fight it -- it really is so truly awful and cannot be allowed to stand.
The Lindens' refusal to really take this in hand through not only enforcement of the TOS, but more solid and balanced editorial voices appearing there, and less favouritism. impeaches their credibility and their claim to be building a Better World.
"...claim to be building a Better World."
Funny. I have never seen that quote. Do you have a link?
Posted by: Delphi | 12/25/2005 at 03:45 PM
It's in several speeches at the SL by Robin and Philip, go and listen to the podcasts on the SOP site and SLCC site. I believe you can also find it on Robin's blog.
Everyone knows that this is *exactly* the Lindens' ideology who has taken even five minutes to read their blogs, interviews, or heard them speak.
One of their main funders, Omidyar, has a "better world" concept and an island his foundation and network supports called Better World within SL.
May I point out that your pouncing on this term, and suspiciously demanding proof that the Lindens say such stuff is a very good example of what I mean by bloody-minded literalness. Indeed these Lindens have such a utopian ideology, and you will not find them denying it.
Posted by: Prokofy Neva | 12/25/2005 at 03:50 PM
So let's say your right.
It is a private endeavour.
Only paying customers have the right to "play".
You seem to want to turn SL into some sort of indictment and civil rights movement against the tech sector.
Why? Aren't there other online venues which would better serve your interest? Why PAY money to torture yourself?
Let's say for a moment that LL is really a bunch of corruptible, hippie socialists who hate America, and so are their "favorites".
Why is it YOUR job to play Jesus and the money changers in an environment that is OBVIOUSLY not going to bent to your will?
You've been booted form the forums. Been warned and suspended on multiple occasions in-world... Don't you see that your idea of right and wrong, good and evil, just doesn't gel with that of LL and a wide slice of it's playerbase? What makes you think that LL will start listening to you at some point?
They've called your "FIC" crap a myth, they've banned you from the forums, they've disciplined you across multiple accounts... What is it going to take, to get it through your THICK skull that you do not own SL, that LL does, and that all your crowing is just a big fucking waste of time and storage space, because LL will NEVER make SL the way you want it to be.
See, you don't get to waltz into places, and then tell everyone that they are corrupt, without morals, evil, and all the other horseshit you've thrown at people, and just expect EVERYONE to fall to their knees, slap themselves in the forehead and say "OMG! Prokofy you're right, we are horrible people, please show us how to act!"
Christ, if we followed your example the place really WOULD BE a dump.
Posted by: Delphi | 12/25/2005 at 04:30 PM
Ms. "Jesus" Profoky writes, "You are all Hitler!"
What?
:O
Posted by: What? | 12/25/2005 at 05:30 PM
Xmas pressie for you prok :)
To the tune of "Stop The Cavalry"
(ding-ding-ding-ding, ding-ding, ding
ding-ding-ding-ding, ding-ding, ding
ding-ding, ding, ding-ding, ding, ding-ding, ding-ding, ding)
oom-PA oom-PA oom-Pa oom-PA
oom-PA oom-PA oom-Pa oom-PA )
Hey Mister Linden, he said over here
Metaverse building splendidly
But on every sign, and the party line
There's another pic-ture of Aimee
It all sells her stuff, I have had enough
Can't you stop the F I C?
I have had to pay tier day by day
Because nobody noticed me,
Loss for every gain, someone takes the pain,
Can't you stop the F I C?
Now my thoughts and dreams are freed
Who cares when they have all they need?
I can stand in my build alone
And still talk on my Nexcom phone.
Dubba-dubba-dum-dum-dubba-dubba-dum
Dubba-dum-dum-dubba-da-dubba-dubba-da
Dubba-dubba-dum-dum-dubba-dubba-dum
Dubba-dum-dum-dubba-da-dubba-dubba-da.
I could tier out next Christmas..
Bang! Now sell for pay in the WA
Since Pathfinder and Squag had tea.
They'd give me a "rack" at the very back
That when clicked just opens IE,
If I got it placed there, I'd say (break)
Someone stop the F I C.
Dubba-dubba-dum-dum-dubba-dubba-dum
Dubba-dum-dum-dubba-da-dubba-dubba-da
Dubba-dubba-dum-dum-dubba-dubba-dum
Dubba-dum-dum-dubba-da-dubba-dubba-da.
I could tier out next Christmas;
I can stand in my build alone
And still talk on my Nexcom phone.
Found my thoughts and dreams were freed
Only as long as they agreed.
I could tier out next Christmas...
Posted by: anon | 12/26/2005 at 08:48 AM
"May I point out that your pouncing on this term, and suspiciously demanding proof that the Lindens say such stuff is a very good example of what I mean by bloody-minded literalness."
Ahhhh...yet another sterling example of prokofy`s "Do as I say, not as I do" ethos.
Yo, Pro-ko-fy....here`s a tip that might save your life.
Take a holiday...a long one. Somewhere close to the sea, that also has mountains....Hawaii is a good image. Rent a cheap cottage away from the main drag, don't take a computer or a phone. Spend a month just communing with nature, breathing deeply, enjoying the act of living without judging.
Posted by: joe public | 12/26/2005 at 07:07 PM
"enjoying the act of living without judging."
Ah, but for this poor sod, judging people by the droves IS like breathing.
Posted by: Delphi | 12/26/2005 at 07:45 PM
wow you closed your entries? i thought you hated when people did that.
Your feud with Aimee should end. It's getting stale and it's not entertaining me anymore. Take one up with ingrid again. Or someone new for more variety.
Posted by: jules | 12/29/2005 at 10:07 AM
im with jules. prok you are going from insane to boring. put your aimee obsession in your diary and start publishing some interesting madness on your blog.
and turn on comments. i am sick of your bolshevik style opression of my free speech!! you cannot silence me just because i have unpopular ideas!
Posted by: informer | 12/29/2005 at 11:29 AM
oh and i can answer the question about aimee and philip being related. they cant be.
cause if ANYBODY treated my niece, or cousin, or daughter, or sister the way you treat aimee i wouldnt put up with it for a second and i doubt philip would either. the very fact you are still playing sl is proof they arent related.
Posted by: informer | 12/29/2005 at 11:45 AM
Umm Prok
is it true that to mollify you LL has suspended you Tier Paymnents for 2 months?
Why do you get a free ride just by being asquecky wheel?
Posted by: stpaulsub Clio | 12/29/2005 at 03:27 PM