Benjamin Duranske, shown here with caliphate promoter.
Oh dear, Benjamin Duranske is at it again! Recently Eric Reuters contacted me and angrily opined that I was being "unfair" to Benjamin and that my attacks were not justified. He just doesn't get it; he doesn't realize what is grimly at stake here: some people in the professions, with very sectarian agendas, trying to mute, ban, smear, and eradicate their critics on the Internet because they want to proceed with their very aggressive and ambitious agenda in building the Metaverse. They imagine that the dubious tools that make social media so accessible to the individual can also be used by the inflated ego to crush critics through defamatory posts. It's a real problem throughout Wikipedia and many other collectivized sites masquerading as "accessible" and "democratic".
Benjamin Duranske is a thin-skinned, insecure, yet bullying personality. The mildest of criticism sends him into a rage. He unleashed completely outrageous prosecutorial zeal on the Ginko's matter, deciding, without any discovery, evidence, real-life or Linden procedure, that these people who ran a bank in SL were guilty. They might well be guilty, but not in the simplistic way in which Duranske imagines in order to increase his popularity in a pathetic populistic bid.
Here's what someone like Eric doesn't understand, because he likely unconsciously tries to follow the old prescription of "the professions and their credentials" and feels at root that they should be insulated from public criticism in a status quo that used to work for even the profession of journalism, too. Social media and Web 2.0 disrupts more than old media, however; it makes it possible to disrupt the status quo that the old media supported, too. The other night a real-life, practicing attorney quietly contacted me. This person commented to me that quite independently, on their own, they had come to similar conclusions about Duranske and some of the others hijacking the SL Bar Association like Jessica Holyoke, another anonymous persona who claims to be a female law student and refuses to provide any RL credentials (that is her right, but given the outrageous positions she's advocated, it *is* troublesome in a bar association seeking RL credibility).
This person pointed to me to several other law or lawyers' groups that had quietly begun in Second Life that...surprise, surprise...had gotten started and flourished without Benjamin Duranske, Ashcroft Burnham, or Jessica Holyoke, controversial and unpleasant and controlling personas every one of them. Good! I'm confident this healthy process will continue, and that's a positive development -- ultimately, no one little grouplet of lawyers can set up something that is a Metaversal Bar Association with themselves in charge and hogging the act of credentialing and silencing the free press -- people will just push back. They surely don't need me to do that. Meanwhile, I'm the target of the smear campaign by this bunch of sectarians, so I'll have to publish some rebuttals.
Recently Duranske has updated his stock page to denounce me, which he pastes everywhere (rolls eyes).