Second Thoughts

Loony Luna Bliss Just Has Two Questions to Answer But Won't Answer Them and Spouts Nonsense about Nanobots

Loony Luna has put this in a comment, but I'll answer it in a post so it doesn't fall from view:

Prokofy, I fear there has been a grave misunderstanding between us. I entered into the thread to challenge you regarding the demonization you frequently exhibit toward all technology. When I spoke of animats related to artificial intelligence I was referring to nanobiotechnology, and I asked you to look the word 'animats' up for a clearer understanding. This refers to the way 'tiny robots' could help us medically in the future, and is a very exciting field. Instead, you lumped me in with some sort of technocommunism ideas of yours by accusing me of being part of some kind of techno-cult, and I received the following message from you, which you failed to mention here in your blog: " Prokofy Neva: Coming into a thread about finding facts regarding griefers, and spouting your theories, which I don't support at all as they are fascistic, is a form of harassment itself. It's not about you "disagreeing with my ideas." It's about harassment with your theories that only support griefing in the end, in a thread seeking ways to curb them. So I saw what you did there. It's not merely a derail. It's a form of harassment with ideas that you seek because you imagine they give you power or your group power or some cult power but they are abusive to others. You have not been democratically elected in a liberal democracy under the rule of law to provide your "help" on "AI"." Basically, you are saying here that I'm an abuser...a facist, a harasser, supporting griefing, part of some sick cult, trying to circumvent democracy or rule of law. THIS was what I responded to. I guess you forgot about the above message from you?

Let's see if we can try again to deal with this SHEER IDIOCY, shall we? 

What you see here is a clear exhibition of someone so caught up in various half-assed spiritual and tech cults that they can't recognize that their ideas are -- to put it charitably -- "alternative".

They imagine they are "the norm" and "standard" and "OK" and the rest of us are hopelessly mired in FUD -- Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt.

Challenging tech cults isn't "demonizing" -- it's challenging tech cults that need to be challenged, like you'd challenge Scientology (which tech cults often themselves love to demonize, and understandably so) or challenge Moonies or challenge the Catholic Church because you don't like their beliefs about gays. (My answer to that is: go over to the Episcopalian Church then. They allow gays, they even have gay priests and they have a very similar liturgy. Instead of demanding that a mainstream religion change to your alternative views, go to the alternative).

YOU challenge things all the time, and sorry, YOU and YOUR BELIEFS will be challenged right back.

On this question, I'll repeat what I wrote to this sorry individual inworld which I already put in a blog post here:

[2018/02/26 20:48] Prokofy Neva: Hi, I didn't realize you were such a tech cultist, good Lord. Now here's what you have to read: https://community.secondlife.com/forums/topic/418728-encroachment-on-robin-loop/
[2018/02/26 20:48] Second Life: User not online - message will be stored and delivered later.
[2018/02/26 20:49] Prokofy Neva: the person in that thread is named "animats" -- he's a total asshole -- oh, unless you think rape RP is fine, you may, I don't know, tech cultism often goes together with those extremities of depravity as well. Well, I don't want it on my lawn, dear : )
[2018/02/26 20:49] Second Life: User not online - message will be stored and delivered later.
[2018/02/26 20:50] Prokofy Neva: you also have to see how insanely wrong and crazy the Lindens are here - the road isn't repaired, it was never my fault, my customers are struggling now, animats is a total freaking asshole, get a grip Luna, I thought you were better than this http://3dblogger.typepad.com/second_thoughts/2018/02/a-linden-injustice-robin-loop-road.html
[2018/02/26 20:50] Second Life: User not online - message will be stored and delivered later.

OH, UNLESS YOU THINK RAPE RP IS FINE, YOU MAY, I DON'T KNOW, TECH CULTISM OFTEN GOES TOGETHER WITH THOSE EXTREMITIES OF DEPRAVITY AS WELL.

This statement doesn't accuse Luna Bliss of "extremities of depravity" -- it has the all important article "unless". This is like "if...then" in code, you know. 

So one more time:

LUNA BLISS, DO YOU THINK RAPE RP IS FINE, YES OR NO?

YES OR NO, LUNA BLISS, STAY FOCUSED

IS RAPE RP FINE WITH YOU? ANSWER THE QUESTION, YOU HAVEN'T ANSWERED IT YET, YES OR NOT.

So let's explain once again that Rape RP is among the worst form of BDSM in SL and is legal in adult areas as a public club -- on the theory that BDSM itself is legal, so why not?

Both are to be condemned, but as I've noted before, one can posit a tolerance of BDSM as a personal choice in the privacy of one's sex life, in one's home. That privacy and individual space could in theory be posited in a liberal democratic state as a necessity for freedom.

But what happens with this cult is that they are always and everywhere trying to push outwards into the public arena to normalize themselves and undermine the legitimate rejection of their cult.

Under U.S. law and EU law, "consent" is not recognized as an exoneration from the charge of assault. God knows, the BDSM cultists and edge-casers who like to be contrarian tried to push this with an appeal of a case, I believe it was from Germany at the European Court of Human Rights, but it FAILED.

Read the law -- "consent is not a defense when assault is the offense".

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 5 states that, “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”  And that stands. You don't suborn it as a BDSM cultist by invoking "consent".

That's because actual bodily harm stands as an actuality and proof that "consent" doesn't diminish in law -- and in common sense and reality! -- and the mental assault of BDSM that might get a pass may be challenged as well if the court has reason to consider that the consent is a sham.

Note the actual real-life jurisprudence:

The criminalization of sadomasochistic behavior in R v. Brown was affirmed by the European Court of Human Rights when Brown was considered at the supranational level as Laskey, Jaggard and Brown v United Kingdom (1997). In the decision, the European Court of Human Rights held that the state unquestionably was entitled to regulate through criminal law the infliction of physical harm and the Court was not persuaded that the applicants' behavior belonged to the private morality sphere and therefore excluded from State intervention. 

So consent is not recognized. We who watch all these machinations also don't find the invocation of "consent" very trustworthy in the virtual context where it can try to get a blessing as "lifestyle" or "roleplay". There are too many cases "gone wrong". Too many calls to the police of cases in RL of desperate people. Too many "sub support groups" in SL. Too many abuse reports. Too many everythings. Too often, the person espousing BDSM as a sub has a history of sexual molestation and domestic violence. The idealogues are always trying to erase these facts.

Even so, in the SL context, as I said, one tends to concede the privacy of the bedroom as an element of the individual's freedom -- but it's on shaky ground, especially as the BDSM practitioner himself often wants to push out into taking over the public sphere -- or anywhere else he can get on a sim. That's why the sub always has to have a notice on her profile that if anyone has any "problems" with her they have to take it up with her dom -- drawing EVERYBODY into the drama that way.

So to return to the public roads of the Mainland:

The reality is, somebody trying to slyly introduce more widespread use of the RLV third-party BDSM viewer that enables you to restrain people and do other BDSM actions is merely an ideologues's efforts to normalize the cult.  That's what's underlying this ideological subterfuge and sabotage. It's not accident, comrades that my Flamingo Court Motel was chosen as a venue to start this campaigh with a provocation that the provocateur would know could ensure him maximum publicity -- and maximum punishment of me on the forums and with a 3-day ban. I truly don't care. It's very instructive to let these things play out in a virtual context so that you see what really goes on -- provocateurs with oppressive ideologies use the AR system and the forums try to subvert norms and impose their reign with the RLV viewer, even, by wacking at high profile individuals and pretending to be "helpful". This active measures agent has also made sure to have an "Excellent" on his forums avatar which he get by making various seemingly "benign" posts and likes and getting others' likes. It's such a transparently manipulative game that one scarcely needs to  comment.

There is absolutely no reason to bless this. Even the crazy Klytyna who is always ranting about the Madlands (the Mainland) says the Lindens will never go for a "kludge" -- a crappy workaround of sim seam "problems" -- involving using restraint from the RLV viewer in some fashion AND a channel which as EVEN Klytyna notes will be exploited by social misfits, i.e. griefers. This isn't rocket science.

That loony Luna keeps thinking it is rocket science, science that we should "bless" and not be afraid of is only more stark evidence of how deep in the cult she is. Once again, Luna Bliss:

ARE YOU OR ARE YOU NOT FOR RAPE RP, YES OR NO.

I think the Lindens would be within their rights to ban it as a public club or site that has mazes or some kind of build to enact these creepy fantasies out is no longer a private matter inside the home. Of course, the Lindens don't have a concept of "a reasonable expectation of privacy". They think it's fine to allow spam cars on the public roads that can go in your house or lawn. They have sometimes been known if they get a hostile AR from your enemy to go inside a PG house and remove some classic work of art that involves a nude. They're crazy that way, too. It's always about literalism and enabling your enemies -- especially if those enemies are the Lindens' friends.

I also think it's wrong to parade chained human beings at public events. It's because then WE are forced to join in, in this oppression of this other human being. We're supposed to buy the line that she has consented to it (it's usually a woman, but it can sometimes be a man). Well, we don't buy it? It's a backlash against feminism and the progress of women's rights in Western civilization. It is a cult filled with lies that starts with the claim of consent, which has so many red flags around it, and keeps going through the notion that the greatest form of love is to turn yourself into a slave obeying the commands of a narcissistic. It's a perversion of the love taught by the world's great religions which has to do with self-sacrifice, but not oppression, with "doing unto others as you would have them do unto you" -- empathy -- which is really quite different than the oppressive fuck-you hedony of "an it harm none, do what ye will" -- because narcissists aren't the best judge of what is harm, you know? Ever. Certainly the hugely devious and depraved Alistair Crowley wasn't, if you read his sordid history. What did he leave behind but a lot of broken lives, and a lot of recipes for assholes in the future to break other people's lives? Nothing good.

Calling out the oppressive nature of the BDSM cult and the Rape RP cult isn't "demonization" or "not recognizing people's rights" because they don't have rights to impose this on others and even make it part of their fake shtick that they don't. But of course they do -- the BDSM personality in SL is always stamping his foot and demanding instant service and gas-lighting and pulling the football away from other people, whether they are store clerks or rentals agents. We've all seen it and of course this kind of person finds it impossible to go "out of character".

And once again, Luna Bliss, she of the Bible-reading and Ashram living and other supposedly "peaceful and benign" activities that seque into her tech cults is free to comment:

ARE YOU OR ARE YOU NOT FOR BDSM IMPOSITION ON THE PUBLIC SPHERE, YES OR NO?

ARE YOU OR ARE YOU NOT FOR RAPE RP YES OR NO?

ARE YOU OR ARE YOU NOT FOR USING RLV AS A 'WORKAROUND' TO THE SUPPOSED 'PROBLEM' OF SIM SEAMS? YES OR NO.

So let's look at the rest of this nonsense:

When I spoke of animats related to artificial intelligence I was referring to nanobiotechnology, and I asked you to look the word 'animats' up for a clearer understanding. This refers to the way 'tiny robots' could help us medically in the future, and is a very exciting field.

Actually, um, no. Anyone can go and look up animats -- I have -- and see there is DEBATE around it as there is on any artificial intelligence. I think it's no accident that the Kremlin, which represents one of the most aggressive and oppressive forces on earth, has put a lot of investment into this field as they hope to use it control people and things. Technology does have the engineers' ideologies welded into it in troublesome ways -- the lack of a "dislike" button on Facebook is one obvious example -- but technology is also wielded by coders and techs who want power over other human beings and whose ethics are lacking and skewed, to say the least. They are not regulated in a liberal democratic society and should be.

The animats field IS NOT in fact bout nanobiotechnology, that's only one sub-set of it.

Some cultists think that it's fine to have tiny robots injected in your skin and bloodstreams. I don't, and find this field totally unchallenged and unregulated and also PS not implemented but that's not an excuse to act against it.

I remember Sidewinder Linden, a Linden with cult technologies as I discovered, kept arguing strenously for nanobots, saying, why, we allow medicines into our bloodstreams, and look, they have time release mechanisms and so on and how are nanobots different?

That's surely a specious argument, as chemicals aren't coded. They are elements with properties, or mixtures of elements, with known properties. BTW not all their side effects are always known

Chemicals which are a limited substance are not at all the same as coded chips or coded anything. Code depends on the will of the coder, and one shouldn't pretend this isn't in the equation. The coder or programmer can also change the action of nanobots in a hostile way.

We already see how terribly infested the Internet and computers are with hackers who spread spam, bugs, malicious code, and cause trillions of dollars of damage. This article just talking about some of the Russian hacking gives you an idea of how vast this damage is, and how much it affects lives. The malice of hackers is enabled in several ways -- by the same kind of thinker and persona being on the other side of the firewall as the computer security person whose ideology is often no different, and who tends to blame poor security rather than the malice of hackers for problems -- the inverse of the rule of law as it has been established for ages. The coder and hacker do not recognize any rule of law over THEMSELVES.

"Mathematics makes the state obsolete," sneers Andrea Shepherd of Tor, a former Linden. That about sums up the sheer lawlessness of the crypto-anarchist and their total indifference to others and their privileging of their own whims as the authoritarianism by which we must rule. PS Andrea savaged another Twitter user who *rightly* criticized her arrogant bullshit and Tor's abusiveness by mocking her on Twitter and blatantly mischaracterized his satirization of her as "sexism" and "misogyny".  This fellow, whose name was Gerasimov spelled in a l33t sort of way once kidded, "Go to the Washington Monument and jump, Andrea, Tor will save you." This was a reference to the Biblical temptation of Satan to Christ, who said "the angels will save you lest you dash your foot against a stone," telling Jesus to jump off a tower to prove He was God. But Jesus did not need to prove this, nor at Satan's bidding.

Andrea then proceeded in good Second Life fashion to ruin this guy's life, hunting him down, finding his real name, emailing his bosses, and getting him to resign from his job and leave Twitter. What a total asshole is Andrea! THIS is the totalitarianism we live under from the code-as-law crew. No thanks. 

Unlike doctors and lawyers -- professions that have board certification, societies, and ethics charters -- computer programmers have NOTHING. Their societies for "responsibility" or "ethics" in fact aren't about the ethics of THEIR OWN FIELD but about how to wield tech in some politicized aim elsewhere, against others.

So I totally get it that Luna Bliss may think nanobots are the saviour of humankind, and perhaps she has some urgent case of her own relative (she has written about her daughter on a card on her sim) where she thinks this might work. That doesn't mean that the rest of us can't criticize technology and be highly skeptical of the ethics of those we already see are hugely problematic -- like Musk and Thiel.

There's more in this vein:

Instead, you lumped me in with some sort of technocommunism ideas of yours by accusing me of being part of some kind of techno-cult, and I received the following message from you, which you failed to mention here in your blog: " Prokofy Neva: Coming into a thread about finding facts regarding griefers, and spouting your theories, which I don't support at all as they are fascistic, is a form of harassment itself. It's not about you "disagreeing with my ideas." It's about harassment with your theories that only support griefing in the end, in a thread seeking ways to curb them. So I saw what you did there. It's not merely a derail. It's a form of harassment with ideas that you seek because you imagine they give you power or your group power or some cult power but they are abusive to others. You have not been democratically elected in a liberal democracy under the rule of law to provide your "help" on "AI"."

Luna implies here that I've insulted her but it's her tech cult ideas that are the insult. Her constant heckling of me in the thread in which I'm trying to stop griefing by Woodbuy alts masquerading as my "bot" and spouting racist nonsense is simply creepy. She never condemns the Woodbury griefers. She also lacks total curiousness and empathy about how to stop this form of griefing by stopping conference calls -- something that many people want. Indeed, this feature is available on Firestorm, which Luna no doubt uses like many do. She can't explain, like others boosting Firestorm -- which she likely does as well -- why, if you CAN turn off the conference calls, hundreds of angry people harass me with claims I've spammed them. Wouldn't they shut it down after one spam and call it a day? Either they do NOT have Firestorm or hey, this is not enough. People should have the right NEVER to be conferenced. EVER. Opt-out FOREVER. What stops Luna Bliss from accepting that? Her tech cultism?

Luna is spouting sheer nonsense about me needing to take LSD -- as if that removes griefing -- and then even admitting herself that she is derailing the thread. She's merely word-salading now.

Basically, you are saying here that I'm an abuser...a facist, a harasser, supporting griefing, part of some sick cult, trying to circumvent democracy or rule of law. THIS was what I responded to. I guess you forgot about the above message from you?

Um, no, Luna Bliss, I didn't "forget" this post but I stand TOTALLY by my remarks which indeed were the proper pushback and self-defense to your weird culty heckling. If you find "the shoe fits," ask yourself if it really does?

Go back and look at your BEHAVIOR in this thread -- heckling, ridicule, stupidity, culty nonsense, with no recognition of the actual problem at hand, and no empathy for it. Note: NO EMPATHY. Because -- tech cult.

Why are you excusing griefers? You never once condemn them in this thread.

Why are you heckling me during a perfectly reasonable and normal effort to stop conference call spamming which most people don't want even if it doesn't involve griefers impersonating me with racist Trumpkin sayings.

You haven't supplied any use case for the need to spam everyone on a sim. Why are you morally blind to the problem of spam in conference calls?
Do you think just because a coder "can" and just because code "is" that we must argue backward to acceptance? Why? You likely don't feel that way about guns or the atom bomb.

THAT is the problem. You're silent on this question because evidently -- and prove me wrong here -- your tech cultism means that you must "excuse" every exploit and "allow" every coded thing. Well? 

YES OR NO, LUNA BLISS, ARE YOU FOR CONFERENCE CALL SPAMMING OR NOT?  YES OR NO.

In fact, sick tech cults do circumvent democracy and the rule of law. You're unable to invoke any actual normal real-life notions of restraint, choice, moderation. In short, a tech cultist.

But I've broken down the two questions here that you can answer in the negative IF you are not a cultist. So go ahead, I'll wait.

LUNA BLISS, ARE YOU FOR CONFERENCE CALL SPAMMING OR NOT?  YES OR NO?

LUNA BLISS, ARE YOU FOR RAPE RP YES OR NO?

Instead of spouting about nanobots and demanding that I expand my mind by taking LSD, answer those questions.

PS

So I log in after my completely unnecessary and unjust 3-day ban from the Lindens to find this message:

(Saved Tue Feb 27 15:36:02 2018)Hi :) I'm not a tech-cultist, but I'm discovering new ways technology could be used to benefit our consciousness, our spirituality. I don't have a firm enough grasp of it all to explain well just yet -- it's a lot to take in. I do understand the dangers that go with this though, and careful attention must be given along the way. With great power comes something great or horrible depending on what we do with it. Luna Bliss Virtual World Designer
[14:39] Luna Bliss: (Saved Tue Feb 27 15:40:01 2018)I think you're imagining that I condone all these punks that harass you, and I certainly do not. My comments on the forum related to your reference to organic law, and I'm very interested in artificial intelligence atm. I guess I took the thread on a kind of derail, but I'm just so enthused about what I'm learning (how technology could help us in the future with AI) that I could not help it ;0 Luna Bliss Virtual World Designer

So again, um, yeah, that's why I wrote my post about griefers exploiting the friendship consent function of calling cards? As none of us consented to have griefer bots as friends spamming us. Derp! 

And yet Luna had to come in to the thread and heckle, go off topic, ridicule and introduce all kinds of BULLSHIT simply because she COULD NOT BEAR that her tech cults were being criticized.

And rightly so.

And I'll go on doing that because in fact I have no demonstration that Luna "Bliss" has any awareness of the harmfulness of tech, if she can't even tolerate a thread on spam from bots.

I'm not enthused by artificially intelligence or the intelligent artifice that promotes it from coders who are the ones who really take power with it. Seeing their ethics-free behavior and appalling destructiveness and oppression in the last 20 year that I've been writing on this topic, I have no reason whatsoever to get all dewey-eyed and girlish and sigh about the wonders of tech. 

Luna Bliss cannot stay focused and off drugs or off the high of tech cultism long enough to answer to specific questions. I may never get answers. Or I will get answers but with some lecture. Or answers with a caveat. At this point, I have little faith in the tech cultist of having self-awareness. Bye!

Tangled Web-382

Well, put away your feathers, you won't be knocking me down. And I'm sure more than a few nags will pop up to say "I told you so, nyah nyah."

Today is November 14. The Lindens in fact met their deadline for -- be still my heart -- implementing a JIRA proposal that I made about a year ago, battling patiently and firmly, to enable people to post proposals or bug finds, and not have others close them, WEB-382.

To understand the full ramifications of this proposal, you have to realize it flies completely in the face of the dreadful Wikipedia ethos (or lack of ethics, really), which enables anybody to come along and destroy the content of anybody else, inciting endless editing wars, until some tyrannical manager comes along and locks a page or thread. This Wikipedia destructiveness, enabled in the name of "freedom" and the ability to "always correct with the facts," inevitably leads to tyranny, as we can see time and again in many fiercely-debated wiki entries, where finally "some people" come and close all debate and content precisely because everyone had the freedom to destroy everyone else's entry. Thanks!

In our JIRA context, there is a dedicated and fiercely tribal cadre that sees themselves as "caretakers of the JIRA," fellow geeks empowered by the Linden geeks, who see it as their "mission" to go around "cleaning up" the JIRA by closing what they see as unwanted, redundant, "nonsensical", fixed, can't-do, etc. sorts of proposals. Of course, there is a world of difference between a proposal that affects some social and economic aspect of Second Life, and a bug find that affects the software, but of course these tekkies don't see the difference, and wish to shoehorn everything into a "reproduce" and a "patch or GTFO" mentality. If a proposal doesn't fit the culture of "open source" freakery, if it isn't about stopping "all business but my business," if it isn't about "we never met a script we didn't like," it can be killed.

To get a sense of the incredible obstacles to a simple premise of democracy and respect for individual rights, go and see the tremendous resistance I faced to the simple idea of having, in this "your world/your imagination" on this so-called creative platform, which stresses the right to IP alone among others, the right to have your content not destroyed. The right not to have anybody else close your proposal.

Concierge Customers Take Angry Protest to Nautilus Waterfront

UPDATE: Protestors are urging residents who are outraged at the price hikes and unfair process to vote MISC-1776 on the JIRA. As of 6 pm SLT the proposal had already garnered 1457 votes.

I'm reporting live from the waterfront in the new Nautilus continent where the new-paint smell from the Lindens' themed build is still in the air and packing boxes are everywhere. Yet the very land barons who just spent anywhere from $50,000 to $100,000 per 1024 m2 off the auction here are protesting madly, waving red and black banners with red, bloody hands with a stigmata-like hole in the middle -- a kind of grim parody of the famous hand-eye logo of Linden Lab. They are mad as hell at new price hikes on openspace sims, have formed a protest group Save Our Openspace Sims, and have turned out 100 avatars on 3 new sims to demonstrate.

Concierge customers are rioting, we're told, having "set the Linden offices on fire," which of course they can't really do in a virtual world, and even with fire prims on Linden land with auto return, but which they're doing with self-immolation.

Concierge List is crackling with protest and swearing and hate. Sarah Nerd, popular land owner, newbie helper and wacky content maker, was banned off the Concierge List last night for saying "Fuck You Linden Lab!" at the news that she and her fellow land barons are taking yet another hit. She was among many land dealers whose inventory was devalued some 40-60 percent over night earlier this year with the "savings pass-along" and island price crash, who is now facing a 67 percent price *hike* on the open space sims she converted to because her full-prim sims sat empty after the Lindens price hike. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Many on the list and on the waterfront are talking about "bait and switch still," noting that by upping prim counts, making parcels divisible, enabling placement anywhere on the grid, the Lindens were nodding and winking about these openspace sims for uses other than those claimed on the website, where careful caveats alert customers who read the fine print that the sims can't be used except for water or forest, and tickets on performance issuances will not be accepted.

Everbody has a story. Typically, someone will tell you about "my girlfriend and I and our boat and home and our careful use of this sim, which was only used very lightly" lol. But the presence of the home, the boat, the sex-bed, etc. all bely that "light" use. "I only had 4 tenants on my OS, it was only light use," somebody is swearing to me.

I'm standing among the usual under-dressed and over-dressed SL crowd, and the Babblers are on full tilt, as French and Portugese residents have joined English speakers from the US, UK, Netherlands and elsewhere.

I guess I'm finding it rather, er, ironic that the black-and-red flags are waving on Kalyrra Heart's heavily-priced land here, with the slogans "You ruined my home, you ruined my SL," which is exactly what she did to others for years on end with her extortionist ad farm parcels and blighty signs. Karma much?

I've got the transcript of an impromptu Concierge chat with Jack Linden, who emerged earlier this afternoon, but it doesn't say much, will post in a bit.

Dear M Linden, Fix the Groups! And Join Some To See What I Mean!

Dear M,

While I recognize you've focused on macro-stability of the whole platform, getting it not to crash, and you are making progress, you should focus on micro-stability which in fact impacts user experience far more, as many people just cheerfully relog after a crash.

But what really annoys and wears you down is the chronic group chat problems, as groups are the essence of Second Life. You cannot find groups in search, even huge groups; you cannot chat in groups without constant errors; you cannot search within groups for their members but have to go through the entire list to find them. All these functions that worked fine a year ago today are all badly broken, possibly because of data base strain. Other facets of the group interface, i.e. positions of buttons for ease of use, etc. all need work. A huge bug is the "share with group" problem where even people who are not enabled in the permissions of the group to access deeded objects can access and sell them or put malicious scripts in them.

I always feel as if those of us paying so much tier, and taking on so much sub-management work of customers for LL, namely *inworld* and not outworld business, are like orphans, constantly ignored, even harmed, and now bunched together with "consumers" in a group LL is less interested in, after "enterprises" or "education" -- neither of which, AFAIK pays as much tier as the inworld businesses collectively speaking in the "consumer" group. And it's because of this lack of attention to inworld business and all the issues that go with it like groups or ad farms (which you are far, far from solving!!!) that you aren't helping the people who are allied with you to increase retention in fact do their jobs best.

You should find a way to focus on *fixing groups* in the next quarter. You could ask Robin Linden about some of the issues as she was here from the beginning with the first overhaul of the groups when they were transformed from hippie communes to businesses (it used to be any officer in the group could vote you, a tier-payer, out of the group, or steal your land; thankfully all that early hippie stuff was removed). But now you have to focus on making them really functional for *inworld* business. Outworld business has less need of them. Some of these big corporations never even bother their heads about autoreturn and grouped land and group permissions, which BTW is how they get griefed with flying phalluses, etc. They don't use the broken group tools at all, which is why you aren't hearing about them. We do.

I don't need to tell you that people want more than 25 groups -- you've heard that. But why do people like me spread 75 groups over 3 avatars? Because groups don't work. Because I can't have a land group over about 250 people, or it breaks down and I can't manage, expel, chat, send stuff reasonably as the groups get bigger. By 1,000, I have a basically useless group.

Groups are the connective tissue of SL; you keep wanting to make SL "like the web" and start ill-conceived projects like "landmarks" which had no internal social demand, but is just a geek affectation of "making SL's viewer like a web browser". Instead, you should *make the world work inside* and that means things like groups and ad farms, which you haven't solved, because you aren't willing to grasp the nettle of discretionary policy and remove chronic offenders because they are chronic offenders, instead of devising rules to capture them and only them; you are also not willing to put in effective mechanical solutions like "no division of land under 512".

Put some groups on your profile, M, and start learning about what I'm talking about!!! Join the Lindens' Concierge group with 8,000 people, to see what chronic 'group error in chat' is like for example.

Prokofy Neva

Abusive New Abuse Report Categories

Wow, I guess the Lindens really do want us out of there, in preparation for the creation of some super-sanitized edu-biz grid.

A whole boatload of very bad stuff coming in the beta/preview version of the new abuse report categories, discovered by Suezanne Baskerville.

A new offense is called "Commerce" -- "Failure to deliver product or service" which is a hugely capacious, baggy and abusive concept, as any nit harassing me about land they think should be for rent and is taken (as you saw in previous posts) and continuing to harass me and incite hatred can AR me for "failure to deliver service" and make it stick, have me banned, and have my land taken away from me.

FUCK THAT SHIT, Lindens, and seriously, I mean that sincerely, and you better not put that in the viewer. It has no business being there, as the complexity of consumer problems in a virtual world with anonymous providers is not solved by a very abusable and overbroad category like this.

Oh, sure, people LOVE the idea of being able to go after bad business. SOMETHING has to be done about the chronic "failure to deliver product or service" we all suffer from. But...that's up to residents to devise in their own organizations, and with their own means, whether by notarizing agreements and having groups like "Honourable Land Dealers" or rigorous consumer reports (which just never get started properly in SL) or whatever it takes. But a ridiculously vague "abuse" like this will not only flood the Lindens with reports, it will make it impossible for anybody but the Lindens' most precious pets to do business in SL, as they will be completely vulnerable to prosecution of arbitrary trifles.

Back Off Katt Linden, Or People Will Leave

Those of us who have been in Second Life for a number of years understand that this isn't just one game or world, but a kind of super matrix for social media and the Metaverse and the 3-D web. The experiences and policies and prototypes being done here are going to have a great impact.

Therefore it matters when the Lindens get it wrong, and it matters that people fight back vigorously, or they are ceding territory for free speech and freedom of creativity not just in one place, but everywhere.

I don't follow the forums that closely, because there is rarely an intereresting conversation, and in fact, it has become quite toothless and tame, despite what the scaredy cats think about it now. But even they are shocked into anger and silence by recent moves made by the new Communications person hired to manage the forums, Katt Linden.

I've been totally unimpressed with Katt Linden for months, mainly due to her smarmy and supercilious posts on the blog and annoyed by her over-moderation, but I didn't think it was worth bothering to criticize. I figured either a) the Lindens are not serious about really making a good forums and have sent her in to destroy it, so it's not worth bothering with or b) the cringing types willing to go into such a sanitized forums will rule the roost and you won't want to be there anyway.

The supine bunch on the forums really need to start engaging in outright civil disobedience to get the Lindens to stop pressing further their draconian new "forums facelift". It rots, it sucks, and I hope Robin Linden personally responsible for this -- it cannot be done without her knowledge and consent, and it was she who hired Katt Linden. Every single poster should be putting up a post with a URL linking to their blog or any blog related to SL, get thousands of people to do this if you have to, and get the Lindens to stop this nonsense.

When Robin discussed changes to the forums some months ago, she held out the promise of lifting forums bans. None of that has happened. That turned out to be totally fake. Instead, a rather worse thing happened: a vague connection between permanent forums bans and inworld banning, which hadn't really pertained in any real way, since "Prok's Law," i.e. the invocation of this "scare" *after* I was banned in June 2005, but the failure to apply it to some really bad offenders like Ulrika Zugzang or Siggy Romulus. Now Katt comes along and tells us that in fact it's very much going to pertain, and only after lots and lots of people protested (mercifully, they aren't THAT supine), she backed off only a tad, saying permabans on the forums MAY lead to permabans on the world. Sorry, folks, that's not good enough. In fact, it's more of the same, and it's unacceptable. No one should have property and inventory confiscated without due process over a speech offense. It is not the law in the United States of America and many of the other countries where SL is reached. In fact, to have any confiscation, due process or no, over speech, would require really extreme circumstances, and might be in the form of a fine for a non-public figure who could show malice and show loss of livlihood and couldn't mount a truth defense -- three factors that few SL posts would meet as a test, since most people are speaking their minds sincerely and believe what they say; LL's livlihood isn't harmed by some post on some forum seen by some tiny percentage of people, and what bothers the Lindens the most is the truth. That's why I'm banned -- my permaban is a disgrace and an injustice, and should be reversed.

Our Terrarium

People seem not to have noticed this strange article in the New York Times, perhaps because the other article about griefers overshadowed it, but there it is, our old fearless leader Philip Linden saying that Second Life is like a terrarium.

Well, thought I. Why should only Philip have a terrarium? (i.e. all of SL). I want one, too! I figured with all the garden stores in SL, surely there'd be tons of them. I found only one! At Dania's garden store in Tuzandi. So I decided to make one myself. With one thing and another, it went phantom, probably because there is some function of sculpties that makes them phantom, too, and linking it made the entire thing go phantom. No matter, that way I could walk right in, and feel myself the concentrated essence of terrariumness. You can buy my rich content for $25 at the ALICE UNITED FRONT AGAINST AD-FARMS and help pay for that parcel I bought in Alice to save it from the choppers.

Philip says SL is like a terrarium, for businesses, that they can prototype stuff and meet there and whatnot. Well, sure, I've always said that you really can accelerate a business proposition in SL and see if it works. In a small SL business geared to inworld realities, so to speak, you learn really fast. It rents, or it doesn't rent, and you have tier to pay, so you find a way to present it better, or you sell. SL is a brutal task-mistress in that way. But it's also fun to try to see what works, learn from mistakes, try this or that.

After awhile, however, like Truman, you fly up against the rounded wall of the terrarium, and you feel exasperated. The Lindens. And their policies. Like Jack Linden's new post about zoning, which makes me feel sick at heart because once again, it means the existing mainland owners will be screwed, left behind, while some new product is wheeled out that can only benefit new buyers. It was bad enough with LPDW and Bay City; now we are to face a host of zoned sims that will naturally sell for more, and drive everybody to them, sucking out what life there was on the core mainland where people themselves struggled to zone -- and with no help from the Lindens. It makes you gasp, really. Why do they keep doing stuff like this? A commentator on the forums (comments have been driven off to the forums) noted simply that businesses cannot succeed when they are constantly disruptive with policies and their non-enforcement like this.

The King is Dead, Long Live the King

Philip at an SL anniversary. Now he's preparing to vacate his chair as CEO of LL.

Hat-tip to Robbie Kiama on Twitter for being the first I saw with that line, "Long Live the King," a play on the name of the new CEO as well.

Philip Rosedale has picked his successor in the job as CEO -- Mark Kingdon, formerly of Price Waterhouse Cooper, who will use the name "M Linden".

M as in Millenium? Or like some rap star?

In another scoop handled by Adam Reuters, instead of Eric Reuters who does all the work at the possibly-trade-mark-violating site of secondlife.reuters.com, M had something rather intriguing to say, that I think would be music to the ears of most businesses in SL:

“Maybe it was the right place but definitely the wrong time for most big brands,” Kingdon said. “I’d like to see a continuation and even acceleration of the incredible in-world development we’ve seen from engaged, highly participative residents. that will create the richness of experience and vibrant economy that’s so important. If there are companies that can participate in the organic growth of Second Life, it’s a great place for them.”

Well, how about that!

My Blog Log

You can read my "microblogging" on Twitter here, page through.

On net neutrality (which I always have a lot of questions about); glad someone finally started calling this issue "net congestion" which is more accurate.

On the awfulness of the SL orientation hubs:

On Blue Linden's awful new ideas to fete newbie helpers in the hubs.

Re: Auction Transparency and also a JIRA to vote on this.

A JIRA to keep traffic EXACTLY the way it is DO NOT TOUCH A DAMN THING YOU LINDENS. Vote for this JIRA!

A good article by Grace on Interoperability and some additional comments of mine from VW07 on both interop and the MMI (metrics of the Metaverse).

Getting it Right About Avatar Rights

It strikes me that this panel discussion with Jonathan Fanton, Robin Harper, and Jack Balkin, "Do Avatars Dream of Civil Rights?" is rather important, and I really do hope they all do their homework and do some new thinking -- and speaking -- on this topic and not merely reiterate what's been said many times before in lesser fora by less important names.

Here are some distractions and cul-de-sacs I think they should avoid -- all various forms of reasons why avatars should *not* have rights that usually sap any discussion of this topic and prevent progress from being made on it.

I take it that if they even have a panel on this topic, all three realize, along with the host, Global Kids, that it's no good saying avatars are mere role-play puppets anymore, and 3-D is something that you play a game in, that with the rapid spread of virtual worlds and the 3-D Internet, and more and more people spending lots more time online, we need to be conscious of what kind of spaces they are inhabiting, what rights they have in them, and how civilization will prevail, rather than destruction. These are serious topics; it's not a game, and I hope they do have the vision to see that if only 40 million people on the planet today are in virtual worlds (that was the estimate of Cisco's Christian Renaud), this figure is growing by leaps and bounds, and is limited by nothing but time, broadband, and a bit of disposable income -- meaning rights matter, as people matter.

So here's the arguments that should be dimissed rapidly -- or not even wasted time on:

1. The Ludologist's Lament -- here various types on Terra Nova, not excluding Ted Castronova, worry about avatar rights harming roleplay or the magic circle or the proscenium arch of games. We can't have Amnesty International avatars bustling into World of Warcraft and calling for an abolition of the death penalty! If an avatar in a game is struck dead or a spell is put on him, the ACLU can't very well be expected to take up his loss of freedom of speech. And so on. Yes, we get it, guys. Laws and rights are suspended in these worlds, and that's a given when you sign on. It's more than fine, however, if we all step around the men in cloaks and not let these little exigencies of level-up PVP games harm our struggle for rights in the broader open-ended worlds and games. So let it be, and don't spend much -- or indeed, any time, satisfying the fastidiousness of ludologists for homo ludens they've got trapped in a skill grind -- hey, wait, call the ILO! This has to be flagged, because a strong case *against* avatar rights is *always* mounted by game companies on this grounds, on ground of *their own* freedom of expression, but inevitably that leads them to crushing rights in general and relegating the avatar to a second-class citizen status.

2. The Coder's Creed -- Coders of these worlds, who are a law unto themselves (or a lawlessness) believe that all digital creations essentially belong to the coder -- and they'd especially like other coders' work to be free for their use. That means the software -- the platform if it is something more -- ubber alles. Leaving aside copyright for now, which isn't a civil right, let's look at the ramifications of the "code-as-law" crowd: avatars are mere pixels, they are mere tools, worlds are platforms, and therefore they can't inherently contain any "rights" in them. The true rights-bearing entity is the human being, the meat-sack or the typist, and there's no sense in even talking about avatar rights, as they are nonsense -- technically, politically, literally.

This is the most harmful argumentation against avatar rights, because these people, although they are a minority of elitist coders in the Metaverse, hold absolute sway now in games and worlds with just this point of view, which they wield to keep themselves full of rights, and others stripped of them. It was symptomatic that when Ted Castronova and other virtual worlders and gamers got together to draft a Bill of Rights for the Metaverse last summer, the put in freedom of speech (artistic creation) for themselves as game gods and designers (presumably to be upheld against all kinds of born-agains and soccer-moms) but didn't impart this right to the customer, the avatar, the poor peon playing their games or inhaviting their worlds. So telling!