-
@misspell yeah she even wrote about me in her blog. She's an old hag that has nothing better to do with her life.
-
I try not to be a hostile person...but some people make it soo damn difficult to be nice.
-
@BootsOfCrunch and if I ever do get the chance to meet her she can meet my new pink stilettos. Write about that in your fucking blog!!!
-
@BootsOfCrunch I don't know who the hell she thinks she is! I try not to hate but I seriously hate that woman.
CS
@_OhHeyIts_K
Etc.
Anonloverz published another pastebin with even more information. It's a mixture of what is available publicly on line and private information I've never posted nor has anyone else every posted. This has been abuse reported.
Not surprisingly, because I documented their bad behaviour, the Anonymous activists were in a lather and dozens of them heckled me all day attacking me on Twitter. Here are the main names:
https://twitter.com/_OhHeyIts_K (this account has the exact same hashtags, comments and pictures as @caylaaaa_x3 an account which has now been deleted.
https://twitter.com/Anonymity47 suomynonA As in "Suomi" or Finland
https://twitter.com/whittny_C
https://twitter.com/ameera1978_
https://twitter.com/RabbitORoadkill @RabbitORoadkill
Another account that keeps publishing my handle in lists of others:
https://twitter.com/ebpersons
Some people think you should never document, much less resist, what Anonymous does to people and that then they will "go away" or you should not "feed the trolls" or you shouldn't "give them more attention". This kind of attitude is what makes them succeed in harassing and bullying and silencing critics in the media or among ordinary people, even as they claim falsely that "all they are doing" is crusading for justice in the rape case in Steubenville.
And more threats from this strange persona and/or online psycho:
Cats Are Important @catsrimportant@catfitz Cat, I am not a "persona". I am a real person and if you continue to blame me for things I wasn't here for,there will be a problem.
Then lots of tweets on the Second Life theme, get a life, get real, etc. This, from a person online all day screaming who hasn't really come forward with any identity. Odd that she doesn't even have a dedicated blog but just appears here and there on others' blogs. I definitely don't think rape victims have to reveal their names publicly. No one is required to out themselves online and they can legitimately use a persistent pseudonym although they don't have a "right" to this in many online services.
Yet a person who is constantly anonymous attacking and harassing and heckling others online, making claims about them, and joining in Anonymous ops has to realize that people will not find her legitimate when she continues to hide under the cloak of anonymity. It's especially fake to say that you aren't anonymous and you are accountability merely because...you talked to Stranahan on the phone once lol.
I think these tactics ultimately don't attract people, and self-discredit them and their cause, as one person wrote:
blackcats @blackcats8Ignoring the crime & attacking a blogger makes #Steubenville look bad. Who are they trying to impress? Themselves? #Truth
The key way the Steubenville Anonymous JustSec activists are discrediting themselves are by harassing critics of vigilantism as a method. And trying to invoke the status of either activists for rape victims, or rape victims themselves as a means of deflecting and distracting criticism for their own "rape crew" logic.
Anonymous hecklers online who post aggregates of your information and claim that it is "already available" are like the "rape crew" who justify raping a victim because her skirt was short and she was drunk.
Abusers and stalkers and rapists use this argumentation: "I get to do this because she was wearing a short skirt. I get to do this because she asked for it. I get to do this because I can."
That's the same logic that Anonymous uses in claiming that they get to harass people because they can; that they can aggregate and publish their private information merely because they can drill for it somewhere or even obtain it by hacking -- "because they can". Therefore it must be "available".
I don't publish my private information online. That it *is* online is only a function of *their* publishing of it.
If they aggregate some publicly available profile and put it together with information that *isn't* published anywhere by me, and I don't see where they got it, then they are still engaged in harassment. Nothing about it is right.
This is typical of the dynamic where Anonymous first does something wrong, and then pretends it wasn't wrong, and then claims you're wrong just for exposing their harassment.
Anyway, an old story, and not terribly interesting! Just needs to be documented, as always.
Recent Comments